CSEM John Molot imposes revisionist history on discussion at CPSO, confuses criticism of “environmental medicine” with failure to recognize health complaint

Over and over, the Canadian Society for Environmental Medicine imposed their flaky ideas into public discussion concerning the exclusion, injury and killing of persons with environmental sensitivities in health care. Over and over, they provided fodder for extraneous debate. Over and over, they enable abuse by misrepresenting the nature of sensitivities, the history of mainstream concern for persons with this health complaint, the accommodation over centuries of persons with sensitivities. Over and over, CSEM appropriated the voice of persons with sensitivities, putting forward a self-aggrandizing revisionist history and ignoring human rights concerns, such as persons right not to be subjected to a reverse onus concerning their experience of repeatable, controllable circumstances. John Molot has repeatedly put forward the questionable expertise of his group as being necessary to prove that persons with sensitivities have a legitimate complaint, sabotaging patients? rights by institutionalizing a reverse onus as a legitimate starting point. CSEM has refused to talk publicly about suicides of patients in their care. CSEM members have refused to stop selling treatments they prescribe. Their members have interefered in the politics of consumer groups, manipulating ignorant consumers into believing that CSEM members are their only supporters in medicine. The damages caused by the flaky ideas, unethical practices, inappropriate interventions, meddling, and outright stupidity of CSEM and "doctors of environmental medicine" has created a mob of consumers who have bizarre ideas about sensitivities. Doctors of environmental medicine may be the worst thing that has happened to people with sensitivities in the past several centuries. The attached document is just one more iteration of their goofiness.